Machiavelli got an underserved bad rap for his writing of the _The Prince_.
There is some really good advice in there. And it isn't mean - It's just plain old truth about how things work.
I'll post a few of my favorite quotes.
===
... any one wishing to maintain among men the name of liberal is obliged to avoid no attribute of magnificence; so that a prince thus inclined will consume in such acts all his property, and will be compelled in the end, if he wish to maintain the name of liberal, to unduly weigh down his people, and tax them, and do everything he can to get money. This will soon make him odious to his subjects, and becoming poor he will be little valued by any one ...
===
Read the Whole Thing Here --
http://www.constitution.org/mac/prince00.htm
Download the AudioBook from Librivox
http://librivox.org/the-prince-by-niccolo-machiavelli/
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
Thursday, August 14, 2008
Not a sure Touch
Well, we would have thought that the Olympic Team USA for Women's Sabre would have taken the Gold today.But, we would have been wrong.
http://www.nbcolympics.com/fencing/news/newsid=210893.html#womens+sabre+team+settles+bronze
The Team of Ward, Jacobson and Zagunis were able to sweep the Women's Individual Sabre Medals (Bronze, Silver, Gold respectively) on Saturday. With that kind of history after only a few days it was too easy to believe they were an automatic for the Team Event Gold medal.
But, alas - it was not to be.
They did make a great showing for the Bronze.
I salute these "Ladies of the Blade", thank them for making their country proud, and wish them God's speed back home.
Friday, August 8, 2008
And so it goes ....
What are these people thinking ?
Complaining about a farm ? That they intentionally moved next to, because they like to see the farm ?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080804/ap_on_fe_st/odd_car_fence
Hey, this guy did not create this farm as a scenic vista for their enjoyment.
It's a "farm". Where productive "work" goes on. The very reason it is scenic on one day is because it is a place of work on another day. - Cut out one and you also lose the other.
Besides - you shouldn't complain about the activities of a neighbor after you move in - with full knowledge of their activities.
Get a grip you city slickers ......
Complaining about a farm ? That they intentionally moved next to, because they like to see the farm ?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080804/ap_on_fe_st/odd_car_fence
Hey, this guy did not create this farm as a scenic vista for their enjoyment.
It's a "farm". Where productive "work" goes on. The very reason it is scenic on one day is because it is a place of work on another day. - Cut out one and you also lose the other.
Besides - you shouldn't complain about the activities of a neighbor after you move in - with full knowledge of their activities.
Get a grip you city slickers ......
Rita Maria Martinez
Never at a loss for making a shameless plug for my wife's career -- I'd like to point out the Website
http://www.comeonhome.org/ritamartinez
Where we will learn about this fantastic Poet and the publication of her new book.
Jane in the Box
http://www.comeonhome.org/ritamartinez
Where we will learn about this fantastic Poet and the publication of her new book.
Jane in the Box
Tuesday, November 6, 2007
TLC 2.0 - Final Thoughts
Friends,
I have decided that in the spirit of Nec Arrogantia Nec Despero that I will try to keep my comments balanced.
Web 2.0 : The web of Joiners
My first comments shall center around the idea that Web 2.0 is all about "joining".
For each of the services everyone must "join" the service.
Eventually, the Web 2.0 person becomes awash in a sea of Username & Password combinations.
I believe that I have forgotten most of the services that I've joined over the past few weeks - and possibly most of the passwords.
Many of us since "middle school" have considered ourselves to be "not the joining type". For the rest -- there is myspace.
It's no wonder that sites such as FaceBook and MySpace are so loved and used by the young. They feel that they are part of a group. Part of the club. Web 2.0 gives a sense of belonging and connection, even if the connection is over hundreds of miles.
The irony is that so many of the We 2.0 social networks are full of the "non-joiners". The people that are not likely to be in High School student government are still likely to have a MySpace page where they have joined the service and are desperately looking for connection with others.
With other Web 2.0 apps you still the need to join. Flicker, Google Docs, etc. I became quite fatigued with creating an endless amount of user profiles. The reason, of course, is about the $.
Why would so many Web 2.0 services offer their online software for free ?
How do they expect to pay for their programmers and computer servers ?
Where is the money ?
It's your user profile. The hope is that advertisers will be able to target products directly to you through all of your User Accounts.
In the end, Web 2.0 is a trade off - I give you information about myself - you let me use your software.
The super savvy Web 2.0 user would be better off creating an entire fictionalized version of themselves for use in Web 2.0 products (they have very little ability to verify your identity). Fortunate for them they count on us lacking the creativity for such a consistent ruse.
Web 2.0 : The web of non-ownership
Akin to the idea of "joining" is that most of the Web 2.0 services do not belong to the users.
For the most part, the Web 2.0 user is using someone else's property. They leave their pictures, documents, blogging thoughts and personal information on someone else's computer. All of this is for "free". The old saying is that you get what you pay for... The Web 2.0 user needs to go forth with full understanding that any of this stuff could be deleted, blocked, or shut down at anytime and everything they built in Web 2.0 will be gone - without a recourse.
The great strength of Web 2.0 is that it is online and easily connects users to each other. We don't need to be great programmers - we don't need our own high powered computers and expensive software. We can login from any Web connected computer and type away. And anyone we want to can see it.
I see a future where there may be a good middle ground of this...
A time when we will have our own inexpensive Web 2.0 software loaded on our own Home based servers. We will have the flexibility and the connectivity of current Web 2.0 services --- and still have full control of the content and software.
Web 2.0 : TLC are we having fun yet ?
The TLC program is a kind of programed Play time. Which, of course, loses some of the sense of spontaneity that makes play so much fun. Deadlines are a necessary evil of any program and for some people made the TLC program less fun than the usual way that folks learn and discover Web 2.0 applications.
I found that many of the people that have the nature to "play with computers" were the ones that kept up with the TLC program. For most others they started with the first one or two challenges and they faded back into their daily work. Some folks, I am sure, learned many things they may not have otherwise stumbled upon.
Overall, it is a worthwhile program to introduce folks to. It certainly did raise awareness.
Web 2.0 : Use for libraries or Used by librarians
Part of the TLC project was to build awareness and find application in the library environment.
Most Web 2.0 apps are not directly library related.
Our Novcat Catalog can be considered Web 2.0 because users can "log-in" and use special features.
Some of our databases such as MD-Consult, EBSCO, PubMed also have these user account features.
Wow these are great Web 2.0 tools.
But, so many of the other "fun" apps and "social networking" apps are geared to the individual user.
So, a Librarian may find a Web 2.0 app useful to do certain things, but it would not be useful to the Library as a whole.
The most useful Web 2.0 feature for libraries is that it raises bar of possibilities.
It opens the conversation and asks us if some of the features of these programs can be used to serve our work and our patrons better.
Sure - most of the Web 2.0 stuff can be considered "Web Toys". But even the child that plays "house" will eventually put those skills to use when they become a parent.
I don't support "band wagon" approaches. I don't support the idea that we need to participate in every Web 2.0 application, social network, etc so we can remain "relevant librarians".
I do support the idea that we should keep up with current ideas and trends online and pick out the useful jewels that can help us do our jobs better.
--- and that's my final thought.
I have decided that in the spirit of Nec Arrogantia Nec Despero that I will try to keep my comments balanced.
Web 2.0 : The web of Joiners
My first comments shall center around the idea that Web 2.0 is all about "joining".
For each of the services everyone must "join" the service.
Eventually, the Web 2.0 person becomes awash in a sea of Username & Password combinations.
I believe that I have forgotten most of the services that I've joined over the past few weeks - and possibly most of the passwords.
Many of us since "middle school" have considered ourselves to be "not the joining type". For the rest -- there is myspace.
It's no wonder that sites such as FaceBook and MySpace are so loved and used by the young. They feel that they are part of a group. Part of the club. Web 2.0 gives a sense of belonging and connection, even if the connection is over hundreds of miles.
The irony is that so many of the We 2.0 social networks are full of the "non-joiners". The people that are not likely to be in High School student government are still likely to have a MySpace page where they have joined the service and are desperately looking for connection with others.
With other Web 2.0 apps you still the need to join. Flicker, Google Docs, etc. I became quite fatigued with creating an endless amount of user profiles. The reason, of course, is about the $.
Why would so many Web 2.0 services offer their online software for free ?
How do they expect to pay for their programmers and computer servers ?
Where is the money ?
It's your user profile. The hope is that advertisers will be able to target products directly to you through all of your User Accounts.
In the end, Web 2.0 is a trade off - I give you information about myself - you let me use your software.
The super savvy Web 2.0 user would be better off creating an entire fictionalized version of themselves for use in Web 2.0 products (they have very little ability to verify your identity). Fortunate for them they count on us lacking the creativity for such a consistent ruse.
Web 2.0 : The web of non-ownership
Akin to the idea of "joining" is that most of the Web 2.0 services do not belong to the users.
For the most part, the Web 2.0 user is using someone else's property. They leave their pictures, documents, blogging thoughts and personal information on someone else's computer. All of this is for "free". The old saying is that you get what you pay for... The Web 2.0 user needs to go forth with full understanding that any of this stuff could be deleted, blocked, or shut down at anytime and everything they built in Web 2.0 will be gone - without a recourse.
The great strength of Web 2.0 is that it is online and easily connects users to each other. We don't need to be great programmers - we don't need our own high powered computers and expensive software. We can login from any Web connected computer and type away. And anyone we want to can see it.
I see a future where there may be a good middle ground of this...
A time when we will have our own inexpensive Web 2.0 software loaded on our own Home based servers. We will have the flexibility and the connectivity of current Web 2.0 services --- and still have full control of the content and software.
Web 2.0 : TLC are we having fun yet ?
The TLC program is a kind of programed Play time. Which, of course, loses some of the sense of spontaneity that makes play so much fun. Deadlines are a necessary evil of any program and for some people made the TLC program less fun than the usual way that folks learn and discover Web 2.0 applications.
I found that many of the people that have the nature to "play with computers" were the ones that kept up with the TLC program. For most others they started with the first one or two challenges and they faded back into their daily work. Some folks, I am sure, learned many things they may not have otherwise stumbled upon.
Overall, it is a worthwhile program to introduce folks to. It certainly did raise awareness.
Web 2.0 : Use for libraries or Used by librarians
Part of the TLC project was to build awareness and find application in the library environment.
Most Web 2.0 apps are not directly library related.
Our Novcat Catalog can be considered Web 2.0 because users can "log-in" and use special features.
Some of our databases such as MD-Consult, EBSCO, PubMed also have these user account features.
Wow these are great Web 2.0 tools.
But, so many of the other "fun" apps and "social networking" apps are geared to the individual user.
So, a Librarian may find a Web 2.0 app useful to do certain things, but it would not be useful to the Library as a whole.
The most useful Web 2.0 feature for libraries is that it raises bar of possibilities.
It opens the conversation and asks us if some of the features of these programs can be used to serve our work and our patrons better.
Sure - most of the Web 2.0 stuff can be considered "Web Toys". But even the child that plays "house" will eventually put those skills to use when they become a parent.
I don't support "band wagon" approaches. I don't support the idea that we need to participate in every Web 2.0 application, social network, etc so we can remain "relevant librarians".
I do support the idea that we should keep up with current ideas and trends online and pick out the useful jewels that can help us do our jobs better.
--- and that's my final thought.
Friday, November 2, 2007
TLC Web 2.0 - Facebook
Time - Time - Time
There just isn't enough time to play with Face Book.
I'm using it right now to keep in touch with the Catholic Campus Ministry Group.
It is neater and cleaner than MySpace. - but it doesn't seem as much "fun"
The Clean small text look of FaceBook makes it very text and reading intensive.
It does make a lot of sense on Campus for a library to have a presence on FaceBook - or at least some of the librarians.
The announcements features are good. Some of the Apps seem like fun.
Most of Web 2.0 stuff is a collection of Web Toys for Folks that like to play. Online.
Overall I like facebook - but I would agree with the DaisyDog blog that I'm starting to get too old for a Social Networking Site like that.
Honestly, I just don't care that much about keeping up with my friends and them keeping up with me.
I'd use FaceBook as an occassional tool - or a complete life consuming toy. There doesn't seem to be any half-way point.
TJP
There just isn't enough time to play with Face Book.
I'm using it right now to keep in touch with the Catholic Campus Ministry Group.
It is neater and cleaner than MySpace. - but it doesn't seem as much "fun"
The Clean small text look of FaceBook makes it very text and reading intensive.
It does make a lot of sense on Campus for a library to have a presence on FaceBook - or at least some of the librarians.
The announcements features are good. Some of the Apps seem like fun.
Most of Web 2.0 stuff is a collection of Web Toys for Folks that like to play. Online.
Overall I like facebook - but I would agree with the DaisyDog blog that I'm starting to get too old for a Social Networking Site like that.
Honestly, I just don't care that much about keeping up with my friends and them keeping up with me.
I'd use FaceBook as an occassional tool - or a complete life consuming toy. There doesn't seem to be any half-way point.
TJP
TLC Web 2.0 Podcasting
This thing to to cover Podcasting.
Besides pictures I have always been interested in Audio downloading from the Internet.
There once were large FTP depositories of sound clips from movies and TV shows. We could download them and assign them to events on our computers.
Eventually, the web downloading became faster and the formats became more compact.
.MP3 hit the scene and Web music was never the same.
Of course most folks knew that this was mostly for sharing songs...
Napster - mp3.com and other services. But the idea of AudioBooks and serialized Audio programing was not unheard of.
Services such as Audible.com began as a subscriptions service where Audiobooks and a Weekly version of various Audio Magazines could be downloaded.
They even offered the free Audible Otis MP3 player when you singed up. -- Yep all the way back in 2001.
--- The world of Podcasting - exploded when the IPOD was released and associated with ITUNES.
The Idea that ITUNES could offer a way for various serialized audio programs to be registered and found... along with the advent of RSS feeds... really made all the difference.
Also - the availability of inexpensive Audio Hardware and Software on the PC desktop - with high speed Internet access made creating Serialized audio programs an easy and fun thing for folks to do.
I live off of the Audio format.
All my fun book reading is AudioBooks.
The original format of Story Telling .... reading is a true bore to me.
Podcasting is gives me just what I like and need --- and it cane be done while Multi Tasking.
-- Although I'll admit I don't like the word - "podcast" - it's a new lingo for an older idea.
OH - well who am I to argure with a living language like English... ?
Many years ago folks with amature radio stations could broadcast their own "pirate radio shows" - Podcasting is more similar 'power to the people' !
Besides pictures I have always been interested in Audio downloading from the Internet.
There once were large FTP depositories of sound clips from movies and TV shows. We could download them and assign them to events on our computers.
Eventually, the web downloading became faster and the formats became more compact.
.MP3 hit the scene and Web music was never the same.
Of course most folks knew that this was mostly for sharing songs...
Napster - mp3.com and other services. But the idea of AudioBooks and serialized Audio programing was not unheard of.
Services such as Audible.com began as a subscriptions service where Audiobooks and a Weekly version of various Audio Magazines could be downloaded.
They even offered the free Audible Otis MP3 player when you singed up. -- Yep all the way back in 2001.
--- The world of Podcasting - exploded when the IPOD was released and associated with ITUNES.
The Idea that ITUNES could offer a way for various serialized audio programs to be registered and found... along with the advent of RSS feeds... really made all the difference.
Also - the availability of inexpensive Audio Hardware and Software on the PC desktop - with high speed Internet access made creating Serialized audio programs an easy and fun thing for folks to do.
I live off of the Audio format.
All my fun book reading is AudioBooks.
The original format of Story Telling .... reading is a true bore to me.
Podcasting is gives me just what I like and need --- and it cane be done while Multi Tasking.
-- Although I'll admit I don't like the word - "podcast" - it's a new lingo for an older idea.
OH - well who am I to argure with a living language like English... ?
Many years ago folks with amature radio stations could broadcast their own "pirate radio shows" - Podcasting is more similar 'power to the people' !
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
